Claims
Claim

"Wealth inequality is not at its highest level in modern history."

Evidence9

#1

Saez and Zucman report the top 0.1% wealth share reached 22% in 2012, a level almost as high as in 1929 rather than higher.

The NBER working paper reports that the top 0.1% share rose to 22% in 2012.

The authors note that this level is almost as high as in 1929, implying it did not surpass the late-1920s peak.

The NBER working paper reports that the top 0.1% share rose to 22% in 2012.

The authors note that this level is almost as high as in 1929, implying it did not surpass the late-1920s peak.

Source: Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data
Statistical
#2

The Cambridge replication table shows the top 10% share was 84.0% in 1929 versus 77.2% in 2012, and the top 1% share was 49.7% versus 41.8%.

The Social Science History replication includes a table of top wealth shares over time.

It lists a top 10% share of 84.0% and top 1% share of 49.7% in 1929, compared with 77.2% and 41.8% in 2012, indicating a higher peak in the late 1920s.

The Social Science History replication includes a table of top wealth shares over time.

It lists a top 10% share of 84.0% and top 1% share of 49.7% in 1929, compared with 77.2% and 41.8% in 2012, indicating a higher peak in the late 1920s.

Source: The One Percent across Two Centuries: A Replication of Thomas Piketty's Data on the Concentration of Wealth in the United States
Peer ReviewedStatistical
#3

The Saez-Zucman paper describes a U-shaped pattern: high concentration early in the 20th century, a decline from 1929 to 1978, then a rise afterward.

The NBER working paper summarizes long-run U.S. wealth concentration.

It describes a U-shaped pattern with high concentration early in the 20th century, a decline from 1929 to 1978, and a rise afterward, meaning the modern period is not uniquely high relative to the earlier peak.

The NBER working paper summarizes long-run U.S. wealth concentration.

It describes a U-shaped pattern with high concentration early in the 20th century, a decline from 1929 to 1978, and a rise afterward, meaning the modern period is not uniquely high...

Source: Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data
Statistical
#4

The Federal Reserve SCF note reports the top 1% share fell from 33.9% in 2016 to 33.1% in 2019.

The SCF note reports 2016 and 2019 wealth shares under its augmented measure.

It shows the top 1% share falling from 33.9% in 2016 to 33.1% in 2019, indicating no new peak in that interval.

The SCF note reports 2016 and 2019 wealth shares under its augmented measure.

It shows the top 1% share falling from 33.9% in 2016 to 33.1% in 2019, indicating no new peak in that interval.

Source: Wealth and Income Concentration in the SCF: 1989-2019
Official RecordStatistical
#5

The same SCF note reports the top 10% share stayed at 71% in both 2016 and 2019.

The Federal Reserve note compares the top 10% share across SCF waves.

It reports that the top 10% held 71% of wealth in both 2016 and 2019, indicating no additional increase in that period.

The Federal Reserve note compares the top 10% share across SCF waves.

It reports that the top 10% held 71% of wealth in both 2016 and 2019, indicating no additional increase in that period.

Source: Wealth and Income Concentration in the SCF: 1989-2019
Official RecordStatistical
#6

Federal Reserve analysis notes that WID data show top 1% wealth concentration peaking in 2010, not in 2019.

The SCF note compares capitalization-model estimates from the World Inequality Database with SCF data.

It states that WID estimates show the top 1% share peaking in 2010, not in the late 2010s, indicating that the peak in that series occurred earlier.

The SCF note compares capitalization-model estimates from the World Inequality Database with SCF data.

It states that WID estimates show the top 1% share peaking in 2010, not in the late 2010s, indicating that the peak in that series occurred earlier.

Source: Wealth and Income Concentration in the SCF: 1989-2019
Official RecordStatistical
#7

CBO reports the bottom half's wealth share was 6% in both 1989 and 2022.

The CBO report summarizes wealth shares across the distribution for 1989 and 2022.

It reports that the bottom half share was 6% in both years, indicating no long-run increase for that group''s share.

The CBO report summarizes wealth shares across the distribution for 1989 and 2022.

It reports that the bottom half share was 6% in both years, indicating no long-run increase for that group''s share.

Source: Trends in the Distribution of Family Wealth, 1989 to 2022
Official RecordStatistical
#8

CBO states that from 2019 to 2022 the top 1% share stayed around 27% while the bottom half stayed at 6%.

The report provides an update for the pandemic-era period from 2019 to 2022.

It states that the top 1% share stayed around 27% and the bottom half remained at 6%, showing little change in that interval.

The report provides an update for the pandemic-era period from 2019 to 2022.

It states that the top 1% share stayed around 27% and the bottom half remained at 6%, showing little change in that interval.

Source: Trends in the Distribution of Family Wealth, 1989 to 2022
Official RecordStatistical
#9

CBO reports that excluding Social Security wealth, the top 1% share fell from 34% in 2019 to 33% in 2022 and the bottom half rose from 2% to 3%.

CBO provides an alternative measure that excludes Social Security wealth.

On that measure, the top 1% share fell from 34% in 2019 to 33% in 2022, and the bottom half share rose from 2% to 3%, indicating a short-run narrowing.

CBO provides an alternative measure that excludes Social Security wealth.

On that measure, the top 1% share fell from 34% in 2019 to 33% in 2022, and the bottom half share rose from 2% to 3%, indicating a short-run narrowing.

Source: Trends in the Distribution of Family Wealth, 1989 to 2022
Official RecordStatistical